|
This opinion piece, by UNH Executive Director Nancy Wackstein and Policy Analyst Carin Tinney, was originally printed in the May 9, 2013 issue of the New York Nonprofit Press. Read the original piece here. |
|
Until very recently, most New Yorkers hadn't heard of something called social adult day care. If they did, perhaps it conjured up images of frail seniors on small plastic chairs, drinking from ½ pint milk cartons while having a story read to them by a teacher. That is why the attention now being paid to this program - due to the recent scandal involving two Bronx Assembly Members and the resulting articles in the New York Times about alleged abuses by “pop up” social day care providers- is bittersweet. The unfortunate impression is that this program is at best unnecessary and at worst riddled with fraud, political kickbacks and unscrupulous operators. But the attention, however negative, does give us a chance to highlight the benefits of this program, which when done the right way by credible and professional providers, has helped thousands of genuinely frail seniors remain independent in their communities and has given their family caregivers essential support and respite. The social adult day care model has been around for decades. In many cases, there is a dual focus on providing supervised care and support to seniors while allowing family caregivers a few hours of relief. Social adult day care specifically supports seniors who would have a difficult time adapting to a bustling environment of a traditional senior center because of their frailty or dementia. These seniors are dependent on continuous care and need extra supervision, usually with eating, using the bathroom, or walking. The benefit of the social adult day care model is that it allows otherwise homebound older adults to get out and socialize with their peers through art, shared meals, exercise and music. The challenge to the model, as it was designed, began about a year ago. Many senior center operators located primarily in immigrant communities began noticing a decrease in daily attendance. As a general rule, the number of seniors served varies on a daily basis, but this was not normal fluctuation. Seniors were being lured out of senior centers and into “adult day care programs” with cash and other incentives. This was alarming on many levels. First, the seniors leaving for adult day programs were not physically or cognitively frail, which is the main eligibility criterion of social adult day care. Second, this exodus jeopardized funding for traditional senior centers because reimbursement partially depends on the number of meals served daily. Third, it was clear that these new “social adult day care” programs were unregulated and were not using precious Medicaid dollars in the way it had been intended: to help frail seniors remain in their communities. The new centers called into question the integrity of the entire model and cast a shadow on the longstanding history of many quality-driven programs United Neighborhood Houses, the federation of the city’s settlement houses and community centers, has within our membership some of the finest and most experienced providers of social adult day care. UNH members helped pioneer the concept and some of their adult day care programs have been operating for over a decade. It would be a horrible shame for these legitimate and important programs to be swept up in an enforcement reaction meant to shut down the Medicaid cheats. Legitimate social adult day care programs are one of the components of a comprehensive continuum of care for older adults in their neighborhoods. They greatly benefit a population in need of specialized and supervised care, and contribute to a better quality of life for both seniors and their caregivers through constant emotional support. This program deserves not only to continue but to expand in order to accommodate the dramatic increase in the number of older adults who are projected to need this kind of care. Let’s not allow a vulnerable population to become the victims of a few dishonest program operators. Don’t throw the good out with the bad. Nancy Wackstein in Executive Director of United Neighborhood Houses. Carin Tinney is a Policy Analyst with UNH. |
Advocacy
Campaigns
Click below to learn more.
Join Our Mailing List for REGULAR Updates
The country’s 85+ population increased from 4.2 million in 2000 to 5.7 million in 2010, and is expected to grow to 6.6 million in 2020. (City Hall News)
Advocacy
Keeping New York's Communities Strong
UNH advocates for public policies that provide essential services for children, youth, immigrants and older adults in New York City's communities. UNH does this by documenting and drawing attention to the critical role of these services in keeping communities strong.

At the Table
UNH plays an active role in policy discussions regarding the funding and design of services, identifying effective practices and program models and urging State and City leaders to plan for and fund comprehensive community services for New Yorkers in need.

Taking Action
UNH brings together thousands of parents, teens, older adults, children, program staff, and advocates each year to fight for the supports that make families and neighborhoods work.

Real World Analysis
Based on information and insights from its members , UNH provides careful analysis of budget proposals and government practices and the implications for services provided by settlement houses.
Advocacy News
Do Not Throw the Good Out with the Bad
UNH Releases "PEG'd Away: The impact of NYC PEG plans on New York City, its people and its communities"
PEG'd Away is a issue brief by United Neighborhood Houses, detailing the impact of PEGs to City agencies that provide core community services, such as Department for the Aging, Department for Youth and Community Development, Administration for Children's Services, Department of Homeless Services, and others. Twice a year, in order to close gaps in the City's budget, City agencies face the task of cutting spending; in City-speak, these budget reductions are known as Programs to Eliminate the Gap (PEGs). Over the last several decades in NYC, Peg'd has become the most unlikely of verbs, as in "this program just got Peg'd," meaning the City budget proposal includes a program that will be restructured or eliminated for cost savings.
PEG'd Away also explores the changing role of the City Council. Once, the Council was able to use its discretionary funding to support innovative initiatives and meet emerging community needs. Now, this one-year discretionary funding is used to keep core human services afloat. Learn more by downloading PEG'd Away or viewing it online.
UNH Responds to Federal Sequestration Cuts
70 West 36th Street, Fifth Floor, New York, NY 10018
tel: 212-967-0322 fax: 212-967-0792
www.unhny.org
Statement of Nancy Wackstein
Executive Director of United Neighborhood Houses
On Federal Sequestration Cuts
UNH Summary of NYC's FY 14 Preliminary Budget
Administration for Children’s Services (Child Care and Head Start)
Department of Education
Department of Youth and Community Development (Services for Youth)
Department of Youth and Community Development (Literacy and Immigrant Services)
Department for the Aging
Department of Health and Mental Hygiene
Department of Homeless Services
Department of Housing Preservation and Development
Office of the Criminal Justice Coordinator
Download it here.







